<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nuclear Fuel Cycle on EnergyNote</title><link>https://energynote.kr/en/tags/nuclear-fuel-cycle/</link><description>Recent content in Nuclear Fuel Cycle on EnergyNote</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:10:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://energynote.kr/en/tags/nuclear-fuel-cycle/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>[In-depth] Korea's nuclear industry map — who does what, from uranium to decommissioning</title><link>https://energynote.kr/en/posts/korea-nuclear-industry-map/</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:10:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://energynote.kr/en/posts/korea-nuclear-industry-map/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On September 4, Korea&amp;rsquo;s Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC, the nuclear regulator) approved the restart of Saeul unit 3, a new reactor that had tripped automatically during commissioning. One short news item named the regulator, its technical reviewer, the operator, the design firm, the main-component maker and the builder. Nuclear news from Korea is hard to follow less because of the technology than because nobody has laid out on a single page who does what.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>