<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Korea Nuclear Export on EnergyNote</title><link>https://energynote.kr/en/tags/korea-nuclear-export/</link><description>Recent content in Korea Nuclear Export on EnergyNote</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 23:56:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://energynote.kr/en/tags/korea-nuclear-export/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Korea's nuclear exports, project by project — Barakah, Dukovany and what comes next</title><link>https://energynote.kr/en/posts/korea-nuclear-exports/</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 23:56:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://energynote.kr/en/posts/korea-nuclear-exports/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sixteen months. That is how long the European Commission spent reviewing the Dukovany contract before deciding, on June 5, 2026, not to open an in-depth investigation into Korea Hydro &amp;amp; Nuclear Power (KHNP) under the EU&amp;rsquo;s Foreign Subsidies Regulation. The decision left Korea&amp;rsquo;s second nuclear export where its first, Barakah, stood a decade and a half earlier: contracted, financed and waiting for concrete.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>